This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please reply to the sender and destroy all copies of the original
message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email, and/or any action taken in reliance on the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Where permitted by applicable law,
this e-mail and other e-mail communications sent to and from Cognizant e-mail addresses may be monitored.
<jakarta.ee-spec-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 8:51 AM
To: Jakarta specification discussions <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Jakarta Transactions 2.0 - Release Review
Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee and Community
I need your vote to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta Transactions 2.0 as part of the Jakarta EE Platform 9 release.
The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the products of this release as a Final Specification (as that term is defined
in the EFSP).
Please note that community votes are welcome and encouraged. People work very hard on these PRs and seeing community support makes their day. A very special thank you
to Tom Jenkinson for his work on this specification and the GlassFish team for being our first Compatible Implementation.
The relevant materials are available here:
Per the process, this will be a fourteen day ballot, ending on
Thursday, October 28, 2020 after 3:30 AM UTC. A super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification
Committee Representatives will be counted.
The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat, Tomitribe, and Primeton),
along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.
Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide
to support your vote will be appreciated.