Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Jakarta Transactions 2.0 - ReleaseReview

+1

Werner

 

Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10

 

Von: kzr@xxxxxxxxxxx
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Oktober 2020 07:24
An: Jakarta specification discussions
Betreff: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Jakarta Transactions 2.0 - ReleaseReview

 

+1 (Fujitsu)

 

-Kenji Kazumura

 

 

From: jakarta.ee-spec-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <jakarta.ee-spec-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of David Blevins
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 12:21 PM
To: Jakarta specification discussions <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Jakarta Transactions 2.0 - Release Review

 

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee and Community

 

I need your vote to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta Transactions 2.0 as part of the Jakarta EE Platform 9 release.

 

The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the products of this release as a Final Specification (as that term is defined in the EFSP).

 

Please note that community votes are welcome and encouraged.  People work very hard on these PRs and seeing community support makes their day.  A very special thank you to Tom Jenkinson for his work on this specification and the GlassFish team for being our first Compatible Implementation.

 

The relevant materials are available here:

 

 

Per the process, this will be a fourteen day ballot, ending on Thursday, October 28, 2020 after 3:30 AM UTC.  A super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

 

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat, Tomitribe, and Primeton), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

 

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

 

 


Back to the top