Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Approval to release Jakarta Concurrency2.0

+1 (PMC)

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:20 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonteiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+1 (Tomitribe)

Not a blocker ...

Spec files should be jakarta-wombat-spec-x.y.pdf or html as the template suggests.
Spec documents have "Java EE" mentions that should be fixed to Jakarta EE when possible.

TCK has still a lot of "Java EE" branding issues, but other specs passed with it and I opened a PR to fix them in a cross cutting manner instead of per spec.
sig-test-pkg-list.txt has javax.enterprise.concurrent
sig-test.map javax.enterprise.concurrent.sig_1.0_se8: and other even if it's commented
testsuite.jtt says "Concurrency Utilities for Java EE Compatibility Test Suite Version 1.0"







On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 12:40 PM Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxx> wrote:

+1

Werner

 

 

Von: Ivar Grimstad
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Oktober 2020 11:04
An: Jakarta specification disccusions
Betreff: [jakarta.ee-spec] BALLOT: Approval to release Jakarta Concurrency2.0

 

Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.

I need your vote to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta Concurrency 2.0 as part of the Jakarta EE Platform 9 release.

The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the products of this release as a Final Specification (as that term is defined in the EFSP).

The relevant materials are available here:

https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/267
https://deploy-preview-267--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/concurrency/2.0/

Per the process, this will be a fourteen day ballot, ending on October 23, 2020 that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.

The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat, Tomitribe, and Primeton), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.

Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Thanks …

 

--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.

Community. Code. Collaboration. 

Join us at our virtual event: EclipseCon 2020 - October 20-22

 

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec


--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.

Community. Code. Collaboration. 

Join us at our virtual event:
EclipseCon 2020 - October 20-22


Back to the top