[jakarta.ee-spec.committee] New Spec project Jakarta Faces Bridge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[jakarta.ee-spec.committee] New Spec project Jakarta Faces Bridge

From: Eclipse Management Office EMO <emo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:19:49 -0600
Delivered-to: jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/jakarta.ee-spec.committee/>
List-help: <mailto:jakarta.ee-spec.committee-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee>, <mailto:jakarta.ee-spec.committee-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/jakarta.ee-spec.committee>, <mailto:jakarta.ee-spec.committee-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Dear Jakarta EE Specification Committee,

We've received a proposal for a new Jakarta Faces Bridge specification project.

I believe that the standard for the working group is to use the Implementation Patent License (which is what is indicated in the proposal currently). Please advise if otherwise.

If you have any questions regarding the proposal, please capture them on this tracking issue.

The project is in the community review phase. We'll ask you to initiate your ballot when we lock the proposal down for the creation review. In the meantime, please work with the project team to resolve any concerns that you might have.

Thanks,

Maria Teresa
--

The Eclipse Management Organization | Eclipse Foundation

Prev by Date: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] New Spec project - Jakarta Portlet
Next by Date: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] [External] : Re: Shouldn't Creation Review include an initial plan?
Previous by thread: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] New Spec project - Jakarta Portlet
Next by thread: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Agenda for the April 2nd Jakarta EE Specification Committee Call
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs