Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] [External] : Re: Clarification regarding

[Ed Bratt <ed.bratt@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Maria

OK. So, we should allow the EMO office to tick-off all the items on those lists. 

Thanks,

-- Ed

On 5/23/2024 11:19 AM, Eclipse Management Office EMO wrote:

Hi Ed, 

the short answer is that EMO is trying to avoid duplicating review records. 

Usually when a project plans for a release/progress review, they contact EMO to initiate the review which is done and tracked using a GitLab issue.

Since the engagement in GitLab was rather low in the past, we thought it might be better to interact directly with the projects in the release PRs.

The checklist provided by EMO is supposed to be filled by EMO as well. We take into consideration the ballot status and PMC communications and summarize everything into our checklist.

This has been an experiment, and is something that we implemented recently, so any suggestions you or the community might have are more than welcome.

Kind regards,

Maria Teresa

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 11:28 AM Ed Bratt <ed.bratt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi there,

I notice that the EMO is providing checklists for Specification PRs.
Could the EMO clarify who is responsible for filling in and reviewing
the items on these check-lists? The PR submitter, the specification team
mentor, or is this to be left for the EMO?

Thanks,

-- Ed

--

The Eclipse Management Organization | Eclipse Foundation