Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] [External] : Failing plan reviews - ACTION needed!

Isn't it allowed that ballot period can be extended? I apologize for dropping the ball -- yesterday was a US Holiday that I haven't quite gotten used to yet.

-- Ed

On 6/20/2023 6:34 AM, Ivar Grimstad via jakarta.ee-spec.committee wrote:
Hi,

This is to inform you that I will shortly announce on the public mailing list that the plan reviews for Authentication, Pages, and Persistence did not pass due to an insufficient number of votes. 
Super-majority (in our case 7 +1s are needed) for a review to pass. 

For the three above-mentioned plan reviews, only 6 specification committee members voted.
None of the specifications received votes from the following members:

- Ed Bratt, Dmitry Kornilov - Oracle
- David Blevins, Jean-Louis Monterio - Tomitribe
Marcelo Ancelmo, Abraham Marin-Perez - LJC (Participant Members representative)
- Scott Stark, Scott Marlow - Red Hat (Enterprise Members representative)

Is there a problem with the public spec committee mailing lists? Are the primary representatives (listed first)  subscribing to the list?

Can you please verify that you receive the ballot emails?
As a Jakarta EE Specification Committee member, you have an obligation to vote. Even a -1 or a 0 vote is a valid choice. Not voting is not an option.

Ivar

--

Ivar Grimstad

Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation Eclipse Foundation - Community. Code. Collaboration. 


_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!LO6EHgExYQqahU1uDtZNyWXZI4ZjPncpR11LJ6OJPJCUBsAE4xGU5mzEyiiJGYFefY5Ai_EnQ509IJy3ykT8lePTHI0$ 

Back to the top