First, let me apologize as I didn't notice this in the agenda. I hadn't realized that Google docs remembers your position and when I was clicking in the agenda doc it was showing me January -- before I flew to Ecuador.
I like the proposal. The introduction of the jakartaee-wg repository to host administrative and working group things is good. I wanted to see if we're on the same page in a key detail and ask for one change.
One of the motivations for the split was that anything owned by a Specification Project would live in
github.com/jakartaee and there would be no repositories owned by a specification project in
github.com/eclipse-ee4j.
The one ask for change is we allow Specification Projects can have proposal repos -- using the rule above, they'd be in
github.com/jakartaee. We had one for Java EE Security back in the day and we have one in Jakarta Messaging. I frequently promoted those repos when doing talks on how to get involved with the Specification Project.
I'd really prefer to not have to point people at
github.com/eclipse-ee4j as how to get involved with a specification project or eclipse-ee4j (which contains my competition) as the best onramp for getting involved in Specification Projects.
Are we ok with the goal that any repos, including proposals, that would owned by a spec project would be in
github.com/jakartaee and disconnected from
github.com/eclipse-ee4j?Minus the proposals tweak, the current proposal looks in line, but I just wanted to confirm.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins http://www.tomitribe.com _______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxxTo unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee