Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] [External] : Re: Discuss proposed Resolu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] [External] : Re: Discuss proposed Resolution for eliminating Optional aspects of Specifications

From: David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 17:12:42 -0700
Delivered-to: jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/jakarta.ee-spec.committee/>
List-help: <mailto:jakarta.ee-spec.committee-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee>, <mailto:jakarta.ee-spec.committee-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/jakarta.ee-spec.committee>, <mailto:jakarta.ee-spec.committee-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Jul 1, 2021, at 4:37 PM, David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

There is a certain "looks like a duck, walks like a duck, talks like a duck" aspect to this. If we are going to allow the majority of Platform implementations to ship CMP/BMP and users to use it, then how much work do we really want to put into this and basically get that same result?

In case this came out awkwardly, the statement being made is all proposals on the table so far still allow servers to ship CMP/BMP and users to use it, so how fancy do we want get.

-David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] [External] : Re: Discuss proposed Resolution for eliminating Optional aspects of Specifications
  - From: Scott Stark

References:
- [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Discuss proposed Resolution for eliminating Optional aspects of Specifications
  - From: Kevin Sutter
- Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Discuss proposed Resolution for eliminating Optional aspects of Specifications
  - From: Scott Stark
- Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Discuss proposed Resolution for eliminating Optional aspects of Specifications
  - From: Kevin Sutter
- Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Discuss proposed Resolution for eliminating Optional aspects of Specifications
  - From: David Blevins
- Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Discuss proposed Resolution for eliminating Optional aspects of Specifications
  - From: Scott Stark
- Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Discuss proposed Resolution for eliminating Optional aspects of Specifications
  - From: Kevin Sutter
- Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Discuss proposed Resolution for eliminating Optional aspects of Specifications
  - From: David Blevins
- Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Discuss proposed Resolution for eliminating Optional aspects of Specifications
  - From: Kevin Sutter
- Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] [External] : Re: Discuss proposed Resolution for eliminating Optional aspects of Specifications
  - From: Ed Bratt
- Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] [External] : Re: Discuss proposed Resolution for eliminating Optional aspects of Specifications
  - From: David Blevins

Prev by Date: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] [External] : Re: Discuss proposed Resolution for eliminating Optional aspects of Specifications
Next by Date: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] [External] : Re: Discuss proposed Resolution for eliminating Optional aspects of Specifications
Previous by thread: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] [External] : Re: Discuss proposed Resolution for eliminating Optional aspects of Specifications
Next by thread: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] [External] : Re: Discuss proposed Resolution for eliminating Optional aspects of Specifications
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs