| Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] BALLOT: Approval to release Jakarta WebSocket 2.0 |
Sorry. I will restart.
Ed,
The vote needs to run on our public mailing list... jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
Although I've seen several votes already, I think you need to restart this on the public mailing list for proper recording. Thanks!
---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect @ IBM
e-mail: sutter@xxxxxxxxxx Twitter: @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter
From: Ed Bratt <ed.bratt@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Jakarta specification committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 10/22/2020 14:03
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] BALLOT: Approval to release Jakarta WebSocket 2.0
Sent by: jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.
I need your vote to approve and ratify the release of Jakarta WebSocket
2.0 as part of the Jakarta EE Platform 9 release.
The JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification
Committee in order to ratify the products of this release as a Final
Specification (as that term is defined in the EFSP).
The relevant materials are available here:
Specification and other details:
https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/234
https://deploy-preview-234--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/websocket/2.0/
JavaDocs:
https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/235
https://deploy-preview-235--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/websocket/2.0/apidocs/
Per the process, this will be a fourteen-day ballot, ending on Thursday
November 5, 2020 that requires a Super-majority positive vote of the
Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community
input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee
Representatives will be counted.
The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the
Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara,
Red Hat, Tomitribe, and Primeton), along with individuals who represent
the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.
Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested.
Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any
feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.
Thanks …
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
_______________________________________________ jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!MOzlcrXO1OF-R5_6HJfpoSwOkSU3yxCmg6yD5ZYmxBXclgBKQJwFo-A1gRKnwVg$