Attendees (present in bold):
Kenji Kazumura - Fujitsu - Michael DeNicola, Jacques Durand
Dan Bandera - IBM - Kevin Sutter
Bill Shannon - Oracle - Ed Bratt, Dmitry Kornilov
Mark Wareham - Payara - Matt Gill
Scott Stark - Red Hat - Mark Little, Antoine Sabot-Durand
David Blevins - Tomitribe - Jean-Louis Monterio, Cesar Hernandez
Ivar Grimstad - PMC Representative
Alex Theedom - Participant Member
Werner Keil - Committer Member
Eclipse Foundation: Wayne Beaton, Tanja Obradovic, Paul Buck
Past business / action items:
Reminder: Can be approved by lazy consensus.
Agenda
The Specification Committee to vote on this proposal.
This topic will be put on hold for now, backup material for review for a future discussion:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dWDXjtAlwxtmj1LT_mUvSceyU5J5_n1eJvwYO4fhPbM/edit
- https://github.com/jakartaee/specification-committee/issues/27
[agreed Jan 22]
- https://github.com/jakartaee/specification-committee/issues/28
[agreed Jan 22]
Help Wanted: Need focus on this Plan Review column: https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-ee4j/projects/17#column-7346425
Specifications that are on the exception path to have their own Plan Review
Enterprise Beans, JAF, Jakarta REST Jakarta REST is no longer considering anything beyond the basic Jakarta EE 9 release plan [KWS]
I think the JAF 2.0 Release Plan is ready for ballot. [KWS]
The EJB 4.0 Release Plan needs a bit more words… [KWS]
Clarify limitations on use of updated specs released “soon after” EE 9 [BS]
An independent release of an individual spec is possible but that would be outside of the EE 9 platform spec
Platform Project needs to determine how this situation is handled
Spec Committee to remind individual spec projects of the release process for updates to specifications
Spec projects are to be reminded that date for exception plan submission has passed
Status on getting the ballot underway for Jakarta EE 8 “Java SE” specs
https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pulls?q=is:pr+is:open+label:javase