Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] mail to tck@xxxxxxxxxxx

[Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am following up and am keeping a record.

I've updated the "TCK Email received?" based on the information that I have available.

What's next is to hunt down those compatible implementations that have not conformed to the terms defined in the TCK License.

And... for me to come up with a means of making the information regarding who has sent the email available to the specification committee for verification before calling a ballot.

Wayne

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 5:15 PM Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Wayne, based on column AP of our spreadsheet
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LYaff0aq1d6nLmNN2H1oLYfXBh0-Mb-drdm_QxkgN5k/edit#gid=0
it seems that a lot of projects haven't sent the required email to
tck@xxxxxxxxxxx.  Are you doing something to follow up on that, or
is that something that the rest of us are expected to do?  The
corresponding spec review checklists claim that the email has been
sent so there's some disconnect between what people claim to have
done and the email you claim to have received.

I also see that there's two items marked "requires clarification".
Is there anything we can do to help clarify the requests?

--

Wayne Beaton

Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.