Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Review roles, Web site updates, and downloads for approved Specs?

Thanks Scott.

I was trying to decide if we should try and proactively update any of the TCK links that we've been discussing in a different thread. I wasn't up to speed on when the site, and other artifacts would start to become available for the approved Specs. Thank you for clarifying.

I suspect that we ought to just wait for the final materials to become available, before making additional changes -- at least for this cycle. That way, we can make the changes, test them and be assured we won't (probably) need to come back again.

-- Ed

On 8/30/2019 12:51 PM, Scott Stark wrote:
The checklist subitem of the “On ballot completion” step of https://github.com/jakartaee/specification-committee/blob/master/spec_finalization_checklist.md

Defines who is doing what checklist item. For any of the designated specification committee roles, that person is defined in the spreadsheet you reference. All of the PR merges are assigned to one of 4 members: myself, David, Keven and Bill.

The website is updated whenever the EMO(Wayne) has the web team do the synch. We should do this at least once a week in the spec meeting until it is complete.

On Aug 30, 2019, at 11:34 AM, Ed Bratt <ed.bratt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I wanted to follow up on the site and download updates for Specs. that are approved. Who/what is supposed to happen to complete these materials? The TCKs should be pushed to their final location; The Specifications site should be updated; Is there more? What's the timeline for these changes?

There are a couple of approved but not yet merged Spec PRs. I have pinged the person listed in the Specification Project PR assignments and plan Google Sheet. The committee might consider formally assigning these PRs to the people listed in Column X of that sheet.

It may not be clear that people who might not regularly attend these meetings were all aware they had formal duties (for example community reviewers).  Also, there may have been a few assignments (i.e. Dmitry) who aren't formal members of the Spec. committee, who are assigned as Spec Comm reviewer roles. That assignment may have escaped others as well, I'm not sure.

Thanks,

-- Ed

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee


_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee

Back to the top