I might suggest "taglib" as it's a little more specific. Something about "tags" feels a little too broad.
While "tags" indeed feels a little too broad, it's only within the Jakarta context anyway that the full name makes sense.
I mean, neither "standard" nor "library" do much to clarify what kind of tags we're talking about here, do they?
Kind regards,
Arjan
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
310-633-3852
> On Aug 16, 2019, at 3:54 PM, Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> There's some confusion over the proper short name / code for
> the Jakarta Standard Tag Library.
>
> Our spreadsheet [1] says it's "tags".
>
> This page on our web site [2] says it's "jstl".
>
> Alasdair says this was discussed during one of our meetings, but I don't
> remember the discussion. Do you?
>
> In any event, we need to decide on one, update the other document, and
> adjust the spec PR accordingly.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18SraPxRBCOyaS6w-UV6TR-UA1bWy1--sV0ky6msAjWY/edit#gid=0
> [2] https://github.com/jakartaee/specification-committee/blob/master/names.adoc
> _______________________________________________
> jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
> jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
