Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] DRAFT - Spec PR clarifications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] DRAFT - Spec PR clarifications

From: Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 16:02:59 -0700
Delivered-to: jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/jakarta.ee-spec.committee>
List-help: <mailto:jakarta.ee-spec.committee-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee>, <mailto:jakarta.ee-spec.committee-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/jakarta.ee-spec.committee>, <mailto:jakarta.ee-spec.committee-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0

Thanks for the feedback.  Personally, I don't think most developers will
or should care about the TCK results.  What they should care about is
the branding on the platform products.  Still, I'll add a mention of the
TCK results.

Anyone else have comments?

David Blevins wrote on 8/16/19 3:36 PM:
> Looks fantastic.  I'd add that ideally the download page has a link to the test summary.
> 
> Not a hard requirement, but I think it's good to encourage consumers to want to see test results.
>

References:
- [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] DRAFT - Spec PR clarifications
  - From: Bill Shannon
- Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] DRAFT - Spec PR clarifications
  - From: David Blevins

Prev by Date: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] "jstl" or "tags"?
Next by Date: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] "jstl" or "tags"?
Previous by thread: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] DRAFT - Spec PR clarifications
Next by thread: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] "jstl" or "tags"?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs