Attendees (present in bold):
Kenji Kazumura - Fujitsu, Michael DeNicola
Dan Bandera - IBM, Kevin Sutter, Alasdair Nottingham, BJ Hargrave
Bill Shannon - Oracle, Ed Bratt, Dmitry Kornilov, Will Lyons
Steve Millidge - Payara, Arjan Tijms
Scott Stark - Red Hat, Mark Little, Antoine Sabot-Durand
David Blevins - Tomitribe, Richard Monson-Haefel, Jean-Louis Monterio
Ivar Grimstad - PMC Representative
Alex Theedom - Participant Member
Werner Keil - Committer Member
Eclipse Foundation: Wayne Beaton, Tanja Obradovic, Paul Buck, Mike Milinkovich
Past business / action items:
Agenda:
Specification PR Pre-reviews
Discussion: PR Review Process
Assign 2 spec committee reviewers to each specification [PaulB]
Assigned spec committee reviewer will:
provide feedback, answer questions
once satisfied with the spec’s PRs one of the reviewers takes the draft label off the PRs.
Once the draft label is off and then the spec is ready for the final pre-review step by the committee in the next call
Action: Add an interim Monday Spec Committee call for noon ET [Tanja]
Status: The above process was applied to the Jakarta Dependency Injection spec and it was approved to go to Ballot
<repositories>
<repository>
<id>cdi-api-staging</id>
<url>https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/central_bundles-18505</url>
</repository>
</repositories>
Notes:
We could create an alternate org.eclipse.ee4j:parent pom 1.0.6 release that includes this that projects that depend on the cdi-api could use to workaround the current staging issue.
Will create a PR to create this parent pom and email out that dependencies should update to unblock.
Reference:
Common Mistakes found in PRs
Spec Review Checklist