Wayne Beaton wrote on 8/7/19 12:59 PM:
Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee,
This is not the call for the ballot. Rather, this is a
proposal for how the ballot will be presented.
The JESP/EFSP requires a ballot on the release of each Specification
Project. Jakarta Dependency Injection is one of two
specifications "owned" by the Jakarta Contents and Dependency
Injection Specification Project.
I propose, that rather than wait for CDI, we push forward
on this specification individually, with an understanding that
the ballot for both this specification and for the CDI Specification
must be completed successfully before the release review for
the CDI Specification Project can be declared
successful (i.e. one release review for the project, and one
ballot for each specification). I think that this will be less
confusing for the community.
There's a mutual dependency here, right? The specification review
can't be declared successful until the release review is complete,
right?
Regarding the content of the ballot request, I propose that
the call for the ballot include links to the related PRs which
contain all of the relevant information. The ballot request
will look something like this:
I need your vote to approve the Jakarta Dependency
Injection 1.0 release.
The relevant materials are available here:
Per the process, this will be a fourteen day ballot,
ending on August 22/2019. I require a Super-majority
positive vote of the Specification Committee members.
Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by
Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.
The Specification Committee is composed of
representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member
Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat,
Tomitribe), along with individuals who represent the EE4J
PMC, Participant Members, and Committer Members.
Do we have a public web site listing committee membership yet? If
so, you could just point to it.
Specification Committee representatives, your vote is
hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0
(abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can
provide to support your vote will be appreciated.
Do we need anything else included in the ballot call?
I'll send this out to the public list tomorrow. Let me know
ASAP if you have any concerns.
Looks good to me, thanks!
|
