Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Plan B Deliverable for JakartaOne and OC1?

Thanks, David.  We'll talk more tomorrow.  I really meant to send this to the Steering Committee since we talked about it on today's call.  It was just a finger slip to limit it to the Spec Committee.

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter



From:        David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:        Jakarta specification committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        08/06/2019 05:21 PM
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Plan B Deliverable for JakartaOne and OC1?
Sent by:        jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx




> On Aug 6, 2019, at 2:32 PM, Kevin Sutter <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> What about if we would limit our focus to just Jakarta EE 8 Web Profile?

That's an *extremely* compelling idea.

Given how intertwined the Full and WebProfile TCK is (the same), it may not pan out, but that doesn't mean we couldn't prioritize Web Profile specs first.  If we're clever, maybe there's something we can do about the TCK issue, such as simply name it "jakartaee-webprofile-tck" and declare it can only be used for web profile certification despite having more tests.

Also brainstorming out loud.  Certainly worth talking about at tomorrow's spec meeting.

-David



_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee





Back to the top