Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Foundation input on compatible implement

[Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

And for the EE4J implementations, should the organization name be "Eclipse Foundation"?  And do we need to get explicit permission from someone at the Eclipse Foundation before checking that box?

Paul Buck wrote on 7/26/19 11:22 AM:

Following up on the action item I took on our call earlier today.

We would suggest that the very first check box be “Organization Name (“Organization”) and URL (if applicable) // Add here” 

And the the representation could say “By checking this box I acknowledge that the Organization I represent accepts the terms of the EFTL.”

Thanks ... Paul

--

Paul Buck
+1.613.220.6507 (m)

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee