[jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Draft agenda for today's Spec Committee call

[Paul Buck <paul.buck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

For today's agenda I have the following input from Scott and David plus some items from me. Any other topics for our call today? What other items are blockers for Spec Projects getting their specs in final form for release review that require the committee's attention? 

Ed, I added an item for you and Dmitry, can you update the Release Schedule by adding in the "extra" 2 weeks provided by the spec process change.

Jakarta EE 8:

The main items we need to focus on are the ongoing discussions with regard to the JESP ops and associated spec committee PR request template it seems. Based on the current conversations there are at least these 5 unresolved issues:

1. A convention for the downloads.eclipse.org directory naming conventions for a spec project.

2. How the proposed EFTL TCK is presented in the spec project release review. I guess we should just add a checkbox for the link to the staged binary.

3. How compatible implementations host TCK results in general. I don’t think we have anything to say on this other than how validated certification requests are promoted to jakarta.ee

4. How EE4J projects host TCK results.

5. How spec project release reviews indicate that there is at least one compatible implementation. Let’s resolve that on the other thread “where to publish TCK results”.

Revised Jakarta EE 8 Release Schedule [Ed]

Roadmap:

Namespace: javax to jakarta - Big-bang or incremental [Discussion]

Process:

Publishing the fully approved JESP 1.2

... Paul