Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] acronyms vs. names

Bill,
>  Kevin, some of the PR comments I've seen suggest that you have some guidelines
in mind.  Have you written them down somewhere?

No, just trying to interpret the the rules and trying to be consistent with my comments.  Although the guidelines given to us by Oracle allow us to use acronyms with the proper explicit attribution, I actually find that even more intrusive than just changing the references to use the new project/spec names.  There are some cases where the acronym usage makes sense, especially when we're referring to technologies prior to Java EE 8.  But, in most cases, it's just easier and more readable to change JSF to Jakarta Server Faces (as an example).

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter



From:        Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:        Jakarta specification committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        07/08/2019 07:30 PM
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] acronyms vs. names
Sent by:        jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx




Kevin, some of the PR comments I've seen suggest that you have some guidelines
in mind.  Have you written them down somewhere?

Bill Shannon wrote on 7/8/19 5:11 PM:
> Some of you were busy while those of us in the US enjoyed the holiday weekend!  :-)
>
> I found 300 messages in my mailbox this morning.  I haven't gotten through
> even half of them yet, but one issue has become apparent...
>
> Do we intend that everyone replaces all uses of acronyms with the
> full specification name in all of our specifications, javadocs, etc.?
> The approved acronym guidelines do not require that, so this is mostly
> a question of style.  With different people updating different parts of
> the platform spec, for example, it would be helpful to have guidelines
> that everyone applied equally so that we end up with a consistent style.
>
> If there was a message explaining the guidelines, sorry if I haven't
> gotten to it yet...
>
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee





Back to the top