[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] TCK process draft vote
|
I’m sorry I may miss some discussions.
Regarding the first paragraph of “Certification Compatibility” section,
if a vendor's certification request is accepted but they do not sign the trademark license,
what can they claim ?
It is clear they cannot claim "Our product is Jakarta EE compatible", but
is it ok they can claim "Our product is certified by Jakarta EE working group" ?
I'm not clear how we should describe their product in jakarta.ee implementations page.
-Kenji Kazumura
From: jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Stark
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 1:08 PM
To: Jakarta specification committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] TCK process draft vote
I think we have reached the point of a workable TCK process for the first release. The remaining issues are outside the process doc and encapsulated in the 3 issues I sent out earlier. We can either vote by mail or in tomorrow’s spec call if everyone is prepared to do so.
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
