I submitted as myself. I'm not sure what the
transparent/visibility requirements ought to be. One can see the
current status (pie-chart with totals of:
approved/abstain/reject), but not (publicly, anyway) who cast what
vote. Bill had previously +1'ed this. I hope the poll
administration feature provides the details to ensure that the
ballot box isn't being stuffed.
I know Dan is
the
official voice for IBM, but I just tried the Ballot and it
worked just
fine for me. I hope this works out on your end.
---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect
e-mail: sutter@xxxxxxxxxx Twitter: @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter
From:
Werner
Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxx>
To:
Jakarta
specification committee
<jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
06/14/2019
02:36 PM
Subject:
[EXTERNAL]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Ballots via Google Forms
Sent
by: jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
As
long as the result is publicly and transparently visible, why
not.
See
my recent message although the reason for Oliver’s confusion
about the
approval and time before the project was created may simply be
the endless
paperwork stuck (from what we heard in the calls mostly at
Tomitribe and
its legal team) between our approval here and the formal
creation of Jakarta
NoSQL only a few days ago…
Werner
From:
Wayne
Beaton
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 21:19
To: Jakarta
specification committee
Subject: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Ballots via Google
Forms
Ed
has inspired me to try a different approach for ballots.
I've
cobbled together a Google Form to capture votes for the
Jakarta EE Platform
restructuring. I've marked it as "unofficial", so consider
your
interaction with the form as nonbinding. I've configured so
that it requires
that you sign-in and specify your email address. I've
configured it to
allow you to revisit and change your answer.
AFAICT,
there's no built-in way to restrict who gets to vote. I also
can't sort
out an easy way to prevent somebody from answering for
somebody else (there're
some tricks, but they're cumbersome). In short, we can use it
to run a
ballot, but I'm not sure that we can use the results.
Anyway...
please have a look.
Let me know what you think.
Wayne
--
Wayne
Beaton
Director
of Open Source Projects | Eclipse
Foundation, Inc.
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
