I think what Kevin suggests would be fine. (Although I'll have to
explain to Oracle legal why this is still ok for Jakarta EE since
the JESP will specify 14 days.)
The only reason I can see to keep 14 days in the EFSP is if the
Eclipse Foundation believes 14 days is the best choice and wants to
strongly encourage derivatives of this process to use 14 days.
Kevin Sutter wrote on 6/12/19 11:34 AM:
Actually,
Wayne,
I think it just got worse... :-) Now it is saying that the
default and minimum review period is 14 days *unless*
you have a
Working Group derivative of the process. I have to go back to
my
initial assertion -- what was wrong with the original wording of
the 7
day minimum (other than the week vs 7 days thing)? I don't want
to
make the EFSP more restrictive. Let the derivatives make it
more
restrictive (like the JESP), not the other way around.
---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect
e-mail: sutter@xxxxxxxxxx Twitter: @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter
From:
Wayne
Beaton <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
Jakarta
specification committee
<jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
06/12/2019
12:39 PM
Subject:
[EXTERNAL]
[jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Default fourteen day ballots
Sent
by: jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
I tweaked the wording.
Specifically, I removed "No ballot
period may be shorter than seven (7) days." sentence and added
what
I think is a clarification to the final sentence (which I
believe is just
restating the now-removed sentence).
A
ballot is used to seek Specification Committee approval.
Unless otherwise
stated in this process (or a Working Group-specific derivative
of this
process), the default period for all Specification Committee
ballots is
fourteen (14) days. During that time, any member of a
Specification Committee
may request that the period be extended to thirty (30) days. A
Specification
Committee may opt (via a Working Group-specific derivative
of this
process or exception) to change the length of a
ballot
period, but may not--under any circumstances--reduce any
review period
to fewer than seven (7) days.
I think that this makes the
intention
clearer: unless otherwise specified, ballots are fourteen days
long; and
when otherwise specified, that ballot cannot be fewer than seven
days long.
Does this work?
Wayne
--
Wayne
Beaton
Director
of Open Source Projects | Eclipse
Foundation, Inc._______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
_______________________________________________