Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] JAXB restructuring
According to my records, the first two repositories are owned by the "Eclipse Project for JAXB" and the rest of them are owned by "Eclipse Implementation of JAXB". Strictly speaking, the later is a correct usage of the trademark (AFAICT).

I am in favour of identifying a better name than "Eclipse Implementation of JAXB". Since this isn't a specification project, we can do this at the project team's (or PMC's) leisure.

Wayne

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 1:52 PM David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As we're doing this restructuring I get increasingly uncomfortable we're not splitting specifications and implementations into distinct brands; Jakarta and EE4J

These repos are Specification Projects and need Jakarta branding:

 - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jaxb-api


These repos are implementation projects and should not use Jakarta branding.  They likely need an actual project name.


_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee


--

Wayne Beaton

Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.

Back to the top