[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Suggested Jakarta EESpecifictaionNaming standard
|
If there is no response to an open letter or ECF lead contact, there
is a procedure to remove an unresponsive spec lead,
https://jcp.org/en/procedures/jcp2_11:
---
3.2.2.4 Unresponsive or inactive Spec Lead
There may be rare instances when members of the Expert Group feel that
the Spec Lead is not acting in ways that advance the work of the
Expert Group and is being unresponsive or inactive. The EG is expected
to make a reasonable effort to resolve any such issues in a timely
manner. However, if the situation cannot be resolved these concerns
should be brought to the attention of the EC as quickly as possible so
they may be proactively addressed and resolved.
If the problems cannot be resolved informally, any three members of
the EG may request the EC to replace the Spec Lead. All such requests
must clearly state the cause of the concern and provide all necessary
evidence. If the EC agrees that there is cause, it may ask the PMO to
replace the Spec Lead. If the Spec Lead is a Member Representative the
PMO shall ask the Member to replace the Spec Lead. If the Member
declines to do so the PMO shall seek an alternative Spec Lead, in
which case the EC must conduct a Transfer Ballot as specified in
section of this document. If no Spec Lead replacement can be found,
the EC shall initiate a JSR Renewal Ballot to determine whether the
JSR should be shut down.
---
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:35 AM Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Given that IBM, Red Hat, Oracle, Google and Spring Source (now Pivotal) who also Held one of the Spec Lead positions were all in the EG, it should not be too difficult to get such answer? ;-)
>
>
>
> Pivotal no longer seems a JCP member, looks like it did not renew its membership, but it is a Solution member of Eclipse Foundation, so it can’t be hard for Eclipse to reach out to someone who has a say there, e.g. Jürgen Höller or others.
>
>
>
> Werner
>
>
>
> From: Scott Stark
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 19:29
> To: Jakarta specification committee
> Subject: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Suggested Jakarta EESpecifictaionNaming standard
>
>
>
> I would suggest that the Eclipse Foundation write an open letter to
>
> the past spec leads asking for collaboration on moving the IP over to
>
> the Jakarta effort.
>
>
