Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Suggested Jakarta EESpecifictaionNaming

[Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxx>]

I guess it may never be improved or touched then, and for that Bill’s assessment that unchanged specs can keep the „javax“ should apply.

Unless the CDI authors find a huge Need to fix or improve any of the core annotations like @Inject, @Named, etc. they should be able to do what’s needed in the new Jakarta CDI (or Jakarta Contexts if that really sticks?) Namespace and Project.

 

Werner

 

From: Ivar Grimstad
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 12:46
To: Jakarta specification committee
Cc: Werner Keil
Subject: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Suggested Jakarta EESpecifictaionNaming standard

 

Hi,

 

Yes, several of us have tried but not been able to get any response from them...

 

Ivar

 

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:23 AM Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Werner Keil wrote on 4/17/19 3:15 PM:

 

Also what About JSR 330, would that remain javax.inject or also get moved over to „Jakarta“?

 

That's a good question that I've been asking for years!

I think someone on the PMC was going to contact Bob Lee and/or Rod Johnson to find out if they were willing to transfer ownership or contribute it directly.

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee