|
Both points have room for interpretation and we'll need
clarification.
I propose we park this discussion and have it with Wayne, once he
is back.
Thanks,
Tanja
On 2019-04-15 1:16 p.m., Bill Shannon
wrote:
Tanja Obradovic wrote on 4/15/19 9:20 AM:
Per JESP v1.0: Specification Projects must engage in at least one Progress or Release Review per year while in active development
I believe this is incorrect. The EFSP says:
For both Major and Minor Releases the
Specification Team must engage in at least one successful Progress Review and a successful Release Review.
That's "and", not "or".
It's not clear to me that combining a Progress
Review and a Release Review is what the EDP intended, or that
the EFSP intended to allow combining them into a single review,
but it seems clear that the EFSP requires both, not a single
review. If the intent is that both reviews would occur, but
would occur (effectively) in parallel, we should make that
clear. If the intent is that a Progress Review is not required
if the Release Review occurs less than a year after the Creation
Review, we should update the EFSP.
I'm not opposed to any of these, I just want to make it clear
what's allowed and what's intended.
|
