| Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] MicroProfile TCK Process |
|
On 2018-12-19 12:36 p.m., Scott Stark
wrote:
We should be looking at elements of the MicroProfile process that seems to work and attempt to accommodate the possibility of MicroProfile using a future EFSP, but I'm not convinced that it is a requirement, and potentially not even possible. Scott, et al, I guess I was being too subtle in my previous email on this
thread. In our opinion, simply maintaining the status quo is not
an option. Adoption of the EFSP by MicroProfile is a question of
when, not if. The existing specification process and licensing regime for
MicroProfile is causing the Eclipse Foundation serious concerns.
We do not feel that the status quo is an acceptable long term
scenario. This is the result of both the success in the industry
that the specifications are achieving, and what we have learned as
an institution as we created the EFSP. Happy to explain more details on a call. --
Mike Milinkovich Executive Director | Eclipse Foundation, Inc. mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx @mmilinkov +1.613.220.3223 (m) |