From: jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Millidge (Payara)
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 7:06 PM
To: Jakarta specification committee
Subject: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Draft TCK License
Again my understanding is if someone did that all they could claim was that their product passed the version of the
TCK they built from a specific commit of the GitHub source. As Jakarta EE is a trademark of the Eclipse Foundation they would need to license usage of the Jakarta EE trademark from Eclipse Foundation to claim their product is compliant with “Jakarta EE”. I
don’t think we’ve seen a draft of the trademark license but my assumption is that it would require you to pass the specific binary TCK version licensed under the TCK license.
Steve
From: jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
<jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Kazumura, Kenji
Sent: 03 October 2018 11:00
To: Jakarta specification committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>; IP Advisory Committee <eclipse.org-ip-advisory@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Draft TCK License
Someone build the TCK binary from the github TCK source,
and they test their product with this TCK binary,
and the can claim their product is compliant with Jakarta EE.
We cannot prohibit them to do so by the current github license.
Is it correct ?
My understanding is this will apply to the specific binary build of the TCK that will correspond with a release of
Jakarta EE and is used to “certify” an implementation as compatible.
GitHub license will be for the source code of the TCK.
Steve
It's not a comment for this draft,
but what is the relationship between this draft and the current github license below ?
<"https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/blob/febd0176d513a2b4d9b13354bf69b6d6c03d79a3/LICENSE.md">
All,
Please find attached an initial draft of the Eclipse Foundation TCK License.
This draft has not been reviewed or approved by either the IP Advisory Committee or the Board.
As always, comments are welcomed.

|
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
|