I wasn't too worried about the referenced conversation.
This doesn't seem like a spec committee issue, probably more of a
PMC issue, but...
I am curious as to whether any group is providing leadership on
issues of this sort, or whether this is going to be done entirely
bottom up.
Does the PMC want to allow each spec project to choose or create its
own test harness for its tests?
Do vendors testing implementations want to run multiple different
test suites in order to test their implementations, or should there
be an integrated "platform" test suite that will run tests for
multiple specs using a single test harness configuration?
Should there be any required consistency in the output of a test
suite to determine whether the test suite passed or failed?
Will the CTS/TCKs be used as-is for Jakarta EE 8, or will spec
projects be allowed to split out their tests and provide them in
some different way for Jakarta EE 8?
Will projects be allowed to add tests for Jakarta EE 8, or will
Jakarta EE 8 be constrained to testing only what was tested by Java
EE 8, ensuring that all Java EE 8 products can also be certified as
Jakarta EE 8?
And I'm sure there's other questions I haven't considered yet. Will
any group be responsible for envisioning these sorts of questions
and providing answers in advance? Or will these issues only be
dealt with on demand as they come up, and if so by what group?
Richard Monson-Haefel wrote on 9/18/18
2:01 AM:
Apparently my attempt to attach the thread of
discussion didn't go so well. Here is a link to the start of
the thread in the jakarta.ee-community mailing list archive.
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
|