Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] The independent micro version proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] The independent micro version proposal

From: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:04:28 -0400
Delivered-to: jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/jakarta.ee-spec.committee>
List-help: <mailto:jakarta.ee-spec.committee-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee>, <mailto:jakarta.ee-spec.committee-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/jakarta.ee-spec.committee>, <mailto:jakarta.ee-spec.committee-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1

On 2018-08-22 2:38 PM, Scott Stark wrote:

I'll take a stab at the proposal for having the micro version of thespec/api/tck evolving at different rates vs the time-boxed,synchronized micro version approach just to have something to reviewagainst what David was arguing for. I'm not necessarily advocating forthis approach as I can see advantages to either, but someone needs topull an argument together.


Thanks!

--
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(m) +1.613.220.3223


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

References:
- [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] The independent micro version proposal
  - From: Scott Stark

Prev by Date: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] The independent micro version proposal
Next by Date: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] TCK Issues to Resolve
Previous by thread: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] The independent micro version proposal
Next by thread: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] The independent micro version proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs