Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Jakarta EE Specification Committee Agenda July 18, 2018
Hi Everyone,

I was on the hook to create a document in which we can document questions of the IP Advisory board. The idea is for us to vet the questions and document them before convening with the IP Advisory board.  I have started the document with my first attempt at stating two of the problems we have been wrestling with.  If you have time before the meeting please review and feel free to make comments and edits.  Hopefully, I did an adequate job of capturing two of the problems and questions but I suspect that there is room for improvement. 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m-GD90eIXTbsbppRfgzVZ3jsHOFgLIzPh-CNLzWQosA/edit?usp=sharing

Thank you,

Richard

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 5:17 PM, Tanja Obradovic <tanja.obradovic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello All,

heads up with the Agenda for the call tomorrow

Goals for this call

Confirm all actions from the previous call

Review the Requirements and Goals document to resolve a handful of remaining issues.

Discuss TCK related topics


Review of the actions from the previous calls

Mike Milinkovich to make the Requirements and Goals document final

Richard Monson-Haefel to send doc with questions for IP Advisory on how does compatibility prevent innovation

Meeting set up for last week of July IP Advisory and Spec Committee for questions on compatibility / innovation - Richard Monson-Haefel document with questions for IP Advisory board

Writing Jakarta EE specification documents

Can we confirm this? Can we have new spec docs created by referencing old spec + additional new specs, seems to be approved from Oracle legal - need a definitive answer from Oracle + IBM + RedHat + PMS (Ivar)

Can we confirm? Other app servers, besides GlassFish can we expect on Jakarta EE 8

  • Wildfly - ? name clarification needed from RedHat

  • IBM Liberty

  • Fujitsu

  • Payara - ?

  • Weblogic - ?

  • TomiTribe - ?


Agenda

Patent Policy document

Continue the discussion on the balance between compatibility and innovation

Mark Little or Scot Stark will hopefully be able to represent Red Hat’s view on the tradeoff between innovation and compatibility.


TCK (Technology Compatibility Kit) process - who is writing a draft? (David or Steve??)

  • Draft due date?

  • Is a week for review and approval enough?

  • Final version of the TCK process may take 2-3 weeks. Can we complete by end of July?

TCK challenge process

TCK releases

  • version management process

    • What should be our approach? How frequent our release need to be? stability vs aggressive releases

  • Who calls for a new version?

    • Spec committee needs to approve a new version; a new version would be suggested /recommend it by spec project

    • recommendation from the project and committee to be used as escalation path (PMC, EMO)

Best Regards,


--

Tanja Obradovic

Jakarta EE Program Manager | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.

+1.613.295.0105 | eclipse.org | Twitter | LinkedIn | YouTube

Eclipse Foundation: The Platform for Open Innovation and Collaboration

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee


Back to the top