Steve,
Thoughts inlined below. +1 on deleting the line
Also, I agree with everything that Steve Millidge said about the TCK, patent grants, and Jakarta EE trademark. Patents can be granted on passing TCK but TCK must be freely available. Trademark, on the other hand, can be pay to play if TCK is passed.
The reference to an Eclipse TCK License was not intended to imply a requirement for a payment. It’s only meant to imply that the terms are not open source. If we want to tie compliance to a very specific version of the TCK, and add a requirement that the implementer can only use that, then that’s not an open source license.
I never intended to imply that there would be a charge or royalty under the TCK license. I have always agreed that access to TCKs would not require payment. (Well, I could be convinced to restrict TCK access to Members, but I always think like that.)
All that said, I recently saw a Twitter thread suggesting we have a two-tier compliance program: a free one for anyone who passes the TCK and one which includes the logo. I have very mixed feelings about that idea. |