Re: [jakarta.ee-community] Is backward incompatibility change allowed in

[Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxxxx>]

Why is it different except the Specification Committee may not always be the last decision maker?

Alex works at a company (Mulesoft) so he's not as independent and individual as Arjan or I may be, Ivar now represents Eclipse Foundation, but a JUG and an individual committer each have a vote in the Spec Committee and Steering Committee (in fact Alex currently does in both, that's a little sad, seems LJC lost some of their representatives after the JClarity takeover or so?) 

However, there are 2 votes representing "the community" and we could make the difference for some votes, especially the ones where no supermajority is required.

Werner

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 11:08 PM David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 18, 2020, at 5:00 PM, Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

What do you mean with "not anymore"? There never was an individual tie-breaker, at least not what we now know under Jakarta EE.

Correct, that's what not anymore means.  I understood Reza to be talking about the Java EE days.

-David

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-community mailing list
jakarta.ee-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-community