I am adding some folks here that should
help and including the Jakarta EE community alias for greater
visibility.
Aside from this, are you interested in
contributing to more mundane stuff like doing the actual package
renaming on a spec-by-spec basis? That is honestly what the
Jakarta EE Ambassadors are trying to build some community
contribution towards.
Either way, it would be great to enlist
you and the JUG as Jakarta EE Ambassadors.
For now, I am going to help spread word
on your blog entry. Are you on Twitter - both you and the JUG? I
prefer to do a shout out.
Reza Rahman
Principal Program Manager
Java on Azure
Please note that views here are my own as an individual community
member and do not represent the views of my employer.
On 11/1/2019 7:57 PM, Mahmoud Anouti
wrote:
With a related post here:
Hello Reza,
Hope you are doing well :-)
My name is Mahmoud. I’m organizer of a JUG
in Beirut. I just read about the proposed plan for Jakarta
EE 9, and in particular the intention of doing a migration
of the javax namespace with the option of backwards
compatibility. One of the suggestions mentioned in the
mailing list proposal (
) was to create an open source project for such
compatibility support.
Has any such project been already created?
Or is there a related discussion about ideas on how such
compatibility could be done? For example, I’m aware that
bytecode manipulation can update type descriptors with the
help of tools like Javassist. I’m interested in
contributing as much as i can within my capacity to help
make the namespace move smoother.
Thx and have a nice weekend.
Best,
Mahmoud