|Re: [jakarta.ee-community] Am i right with the representation in the diagram?|
For more confusion the IP/Legal committee is an Eclipse Foundation Board committee not a Jakarta EE committee.
Jakarta EE Working Group governs the Jakarta EE brand and what can be called Jakarta EE.
EE4J governs all the projects under the EE4J top level project. These things aren’t a simple overlap.
See an article I wrote a while back https://dzone.com/articles/how-decisions-are-made-jakarta-ee-and-eclipse-micr things may have evolved since then!
From: jakarta.ee-community-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <jakarta.ee-community-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Werner Keil
Being in the Specification Committee I know, the term "Reference Implementation" is disregarded in favor of "Specification Implementation". It is still a standard implementation by Eclipse Foundation projects (or some could also be elsewhere e.g. at Apache Foundation) but not a Reference Implementation in JCP terms.
There is also at least an IP/legal Committee which currently has a hard time in certain terms of legal questions like opening up the TCK, etc.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 4:24 PM Richard Monson-Haefel <rmonson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Back to the top