Re: [iot-wg] Adoption of latest changes to Eclipse IP process

[Roger Light <roger@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Kai,

Mosquitto doesn't tend to accumulate dependencies as fast as some
other projects, so it's not been a particular issue. I've tried out
the dash tool and it's... ok. It needs more documentation for projects
that aren't Java/Node based though. I've just opened an issue around
that point. Unfortunately for me, the dependencies I checked were
either incorrect, or were missing/needed review. I submitted some
fixes to Clearly Definedwhere the licenses were wrong, but it's not a
great website to use and I can't tell how to create new entries.

TLDR: It looks like I'll still be using traditional CQs for the next
dependencies. It's a shame, I'm sure the system will improve though.

Regards,

Roger

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 08:45, Hudalla Kai (IOC/PAP-DDM) via iot-wg
<iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> during the latest meeting of the IoT Working Group PMC we discussed the
> number of CQs that have been created lately by the projects governed
> under the IoT top level project.
>
> Our gut feeling is that this number has decreased significantly over the
> last few months. This is good for the PMC members as it means less work
> reviewing them :-)
>
> We also wondered what the reason for this decrease might be.
> One possibility is that you guys have simply reduced your pace in
> working on your code and therefore do not need to introduce new or
> update existing dependencies. However, we do not really believe so and
> thus the other possibility seems to be much more probable:
>
> You have actually started to adopt the latest changes to the Eclipse IP
> process as outlined by Wayne on his blog last year [1] :-)
>
> It would be really great if you could reply to this mail and drop us a
> line indicating if this is indeed the case for your particular project.
> We would, of course, also be interested in any feedback you have
> regarding the new process and how it helps (or hinders) you in your work
> on your project(s).
>
> This way we will have a chance of knowing if we need to invest more time
> in educating our community about how to take advantage of the new
> (simplified) IP process.
>
> Thanks a lot for your help!
>
> [1]
> https://waynebeaton.wordpress.com/2020/05/07/revising-the-eclipse-ip-due-diligence-process-for-third-party-content/
>
> --
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
>
> Kai Hudalla
>
> Software Developer - Bosch IoT Hub
>
> Bosch.IO GmbH
> Ullsteinstr. 128
> 12109 Berlin
> GERMANY
> www.bosch.io
>
> Registered Office: Berlin, Registration Court: Amtsgericht
> Charlottenburg; HRB 148411 B
> Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Dr.-Ing. Thorsten Lücke;
> Managing Directors: Dr. Stefan Ferber, Dr. Aleksandar Mitrovic, Yvonne
> Reckling
> _______________________________________________
> iot-wg mailing list
> iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg