Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [iot-wg] Draft of Eclipse IoT Top-level Charter

Ian,

 

I certainly think scalability is important but I am not sure if it is something that needs to be specified in a top-level charter. It would be similar to state that all the projects need to be of high quality and well tested. This is certainly true but it is something we let the individual projects to determine. 

 

Does this make sense or am I missing something in your point about scalability?

 

Ian

 

 

From: iot-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:iot-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ian Craggs
Sent: June-11-14 5:41 AM
To: iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [iot-wg] Draft of Eclipse IoT Top-level Charter

 

Well if MQTT did turn out not to be very scalable, I think that would support my argument!

In my mind, scalability is always a consideration in IoT, because successful small projects will become big projects, through accumulation and aggregation.  It's good to think about scalability from the start.

Ian

On 06/10/2014 06:24 PM, Kai Kreuzer wrote:

Hi Ian,

 

2) Because IoT implies lots of devices connected together, this has implications for the scalability of central IoT solutions and services, as well as the efficiency of the edge-of-network infrastructure.  I would like to see scalability highlighted in the scope section.

 

Didn’t we just learn from Clemens V. that MQTT anyhow isn’t scalable at all…? Well, jokes aside, I think there are protocols and solutions where scalability is a requirement and others where it isn’t. So I am not sure if it is worth to specifically highlight it.

 

Regards,

Kai

 

 

Am 10 Jun 2014 um 15:23 schrieb Ian Craggs <icraggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:



Looks good.

1) Should "Internet of Things" be defined or explained?

2) Because IoT implies lots of devices connected together, this has implications for the scalability of central IoT solutions and services, as well as the efficiency of the edge-of-network infrastructure.  I would like to see scalability highlighted in the scope section.

On 06/05/2014 03:39 PM, Ian Skerrett wrote:

All,

 

As discussed in our recent IoT Working Group meeting we are proposing to create an Eclipse top-level project for our IoT community. This is reflective of the success we have had to date creating a vibrant and growing IoT community.

 

The process to create a top-level project is for the community to first agree to a draft charter and then the Eclipse board of director will approve the creation of the top-level project.  A draft of the top-level charter has been created and now available for review https://wiki.eclipse.org/IoT/M2MIWG/TLP_Charter_Draft  Please provide your feedback before June 12.

 

We will also need to select leaders of the top-level Project Management Committee (PMC). Kai Kreuzer and Jens Reimann have both volunteered to act as co-leaders for the PMC. If anyone else would like to be nominated please let me know.

 

Finally, each of the existing Eclipse IoT projects will be asked to vote on their development list to move their project to the new Eclipse IoT top-level project.

 

This is a great step forward for our IoT community.

 

Regards,

Ian

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ian Skerrett

VP Marketing

Eclipse Foundation

@ianskerrett

 

 

 




_______________________________________________
iot-wg mailing list
iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg



-- 
Ian Craggs                          
icraggs@xxxxxxxxxx                 IBM United Kingdom
Committer on Paho, Mosquitto
 

_______________________________________________
iot-wg mailing list
iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg

 




_______________________________________________
iot-wg mailing list
iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg



-- 
Ian Craggs                          
icraggs@xxxxxxxxxx                 IBM United Kingdom
Committer on Paho, Mosquitto
 

Back to the top