|
So .. let's restart that discussion ;-)
Since I have a bad feeling giving my own request a +1, please Kai
and Benjamin, have a look and make your decision. :)
Thanks
Jens
On 09/02/2014 10:55 PM, Jens Reimann wrote:
Sounds good to me.
On Sep 2, 2014 10:03 PM, Kai Kreuzer
<kai@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I’d be fine with an informal agreement here.
So shall we go for Wayne’s suggestion?
At least two +1 and no -1 within one week?
Best regards,
Kai
I don't recall
seeing this formalized by any PMC.
Wayne
On 02/09/14 09:32 AM,
Jens Reimann wrote:
Hm,
So it would be ok to just define it and write it
down in the wiki? Is there a good reference in the
wiki how this is written down?
Thanks for helping
Jens
On 09/02/2014 03:27 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
Other PMCs tend to use the standard one week of
voting practice. We tend to be flexible with
regard to the standard 3 x +1 requirement,
however.
The Technology PMC approves many of these with
only the initial pitch (usually by a PMC member;
okay... usually me) and a +1 from any other PMC
member. I believe that we're good-to-go if at
least two PMC members are involved in the
discussion.
HTH,
Wayne
On 02/09/14 06:19 AM,
Kai Kreuzer wrote:
Ok, Jens just corrected me that this discussion is necessary in any case.
So I vote +1 and wonder what process we should agree on within the PMC to deal with such CQs?
Shall we:
- approve if there is no veto within 1 week?
- approve if at least x PMC members gave a +1?
What is a common practice within other PMCs?
Regards;
Kai
Am 02 Sep 2014 um 11:52 schrieb Kai Kreuzer <kai@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
Looks straight forward to me, I just added a +1.
Just to understand the process: Is it required to send e-mails to the PMC mailing list or should the PMC leads receive bugzilla notifications about pending CQs?
And under which conditions is a discussion necessary? From what I had learned so far is that pre-req CQs are actually seen less strict than other CQs, where no discussion is required. I am asking as I actually still have to create a pre-req request for my whole SmartHome target platform, which is pretty big…
Sorry, if this are stupid questions, but I am strill trying to get into the new role and welcome any mentoring.
Cheers,
Kai
Am 02 Sep 2014 um 11:23 schrieb Jens Reimann <jens.reimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hello PMC,
the Eclipse SCADA Project would like to add "libevent" as a
pre-requisite. It is expected that the library is already on the user's
machine. Neither the source nor the binaries will be distributed.
This is the discussion for CQ8604 [1].
This request needs to be approved (+1).
Thanks
Jens
[1] https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8604
_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc
_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc
_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc
_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password,
or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc
_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc
--
IBH SYSTEMS GmbH
D-85235 Pfaffenhofen an der Glonn
Läutenring 43
Geschäftsführer / CEO: Dr. Thomas Heitzig
Amtsgericht München
Handelsregister Nummer HRB 197959
USt ID: DE267945175
Office Munich
D 80992 München
Agnes-Pockels-Bogen 1
T +49 89 18 9 17 49 0
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or pivileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of,
or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons
or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from any computer.
|
