I don't recall seeing this formalized by any PMC.
Wayne
On 02/09/14 09:32 AM, Jens Reimann
wrote:
Hm,
So it would be ok to just define it and write it down in the
wiki? Is there a good reference in the wiki how this is written
down?
Thanks for helping
Jens
On 09/02/2014 03:27 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
Other PMCs tend to use the standard one week of voting practice.
We tend to be flexible with regard to the standard 3 x +1
requirement, however.
The Technology PMC approves many of these with only the initial
pitch (usually by a PMC member; okay... usually me) and a +1
from any other PMC member. I believe that we're good-to-go if at
least two PMC members are involved in the discussion.
HTH,
Wayne
On 02/09/14 06:19 AM, Kai Kreuzer
wrote:
Ok, Jens just corrected me that this discussion is necessary in any case.
So I vote +1 and wonder what process we should agree on within the PMC to deal with such CQs?
Shall we:
- approve if there is no veto within 1 week?
- approve if at least x PMC members gave a +1?
What is a common practice within other PMCs?
Regards;
Kai
Am 02 Sep 2014 um 11:52 schrieb Kai Kreuzer <kai@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
Looks straight forward to me, I just added a +1.
Just to understand the process: Is it required to send e-mails to the PMC mailing list or should the PMC leads receive bugzilla notifications about pending CQs?
And under which conditions is a discussion necessary? From what I had learned so far is that pre-req CQs are actually seen less strict than other CQs, where no discussion is required. I am asking as I actually still have to create a pre-req request for my whole SmartHome target platform, which is pretty big…
Sorry, if this are stupid questions, but I am strill trying to get into the new role and welcome any mentoring.
Cheers,
Kai
Am 02 Sep 2014 um 11:23 schrieb Jens Reimann <jens.reimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hello PMC,
the Eclipse SCADA Project would like to add "libevent" as a
pre-requisite. It is expected that the library is already on the user's
machine. Neither the source nor the binaries will be distributed.
This is the discussion for CQ8604 [1].
This request needs to be approved (+1).
Thanks
Jens
[1] https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8604
_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc
_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc
_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
 |
