I think it’s good to
create the release records in the portal to publish releases
so that users can find
this information for all projects in a uniform way. Also PMI
provides some automation
which I find useful.
Though the mandatory
review period and the small number of review slots (2 per
Is in the way of fast
Maybe we could get rid
of the rigid release review process and replace it by a more
flexible one based on
lazy consensus on a release review mailing list.
release records and IP log on release review mailing list
and asks for release review
(not on the current
fixed bi-weekly schedule, but at any date). If PMC accepts
the release and
no one else objects on
the release review list within e.g. 3 days the review is
and the release can be
On Wed, Mar 28,
2018 at 4:52 PM, Gorkem Ercan <gorkem.ercan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Release notes (the new & noteworthy) a better
format the outsiders audience?
at the moment, I don't think such N&N external
documents are sustainable enough (in term of URL
location and so on) to meet the quality criteria of
typical Eclipse governance.