Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks

From: Robin Stocker <robin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 22:21:14 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-to: ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ide-dev>
List-help: <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ide-dev>, <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/ide-dev>, <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: xQmcBFC74eFTxntFoK6qTsfvdmJvzA==
Thread-topic: Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks

Mickael Istria wrote:
> On 09/22/2013 04:36 PM, Robin Stocker wrote:
>> Can we really not do any better?
>
> It's worth opening a bug to in JDT
> to filter/sort the completion result by compatibility with the type
> of the assignement, and automatically use the type that right
> compatible type if only one is available.

Done:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=417961

Regards,
  Robin

References:
- [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: Wayne Beaton
- Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: Robin Stocker
- Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: Mickael Istria

Prev by Date: Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
Next by Date: [ide-dev] Development Process was Re: Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
Previous by thread: Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
Next by thread: [ide-dev] An "IDE Working Group"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs