Re: [ice-dev] Runtime versus SDK builds?

["Billings, Jay Jay" <billingsjj@xxxxxxxx>]

Okay, so we still need both. 

I'm going to break up our build like Martin and Benoit suggested on the Tycho list so that our products are built by a separate Maven profile. In theory that should make our main build five minutes and our nightly build will take (5+20*numProducts) long to do the full build plus all the products (RT + SDK + Headless).

Jay

Jay Jay Billings
Team Lead, Scientific Software Development
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Twitter Handle: @jayjaybillings

________________________________________
From: ice-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <ice-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Greg Watson <greg@watson.earth>
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 11:21 AM
To: ice developer discussions
Subject: Re: [ice-dev] Runtime versus SDK builds?

Look at the product files it seems the main differences are:

- Initial perspective is CDT for runtime vs PDE for SDK
- Different launcher icon
- Different workspace location

My recollection was that the runtime version should default to an application development-style environment, while the SDK should default to an ICE development environment.

Regards,
Greg


> On Mar 12, 2017, at 10:27 PM, Jay Jay Billings <jayjaybillings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Greg,
>
> What's the status of your runtime versus SDK configuration for ICE? As far as I can tell at the moment, they are building the same thing.
>
> Jay
>
> --
> Jay Jay Billings
> Oak Ridge National Laboratory
> Twitter Handle: @jayjaybillings
> _______________________________________________
> ice-dev mailing list
> ice-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ice-dev

_______________________________________________
ice-dev mailing list
ice-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ice-dev