|Re: [hudson-dev] Recommended Logging solution ?|
Having said that, if it is plugin only changes for v2 then go ahead. sl4j is agreed up on by many people.
- Winston On 2/6/12 1:45 PM, Henrik Lynggaard Hansen wrote:
Hi This is a spin off from the PluginContext discussion. I am currently updating a plugin and as part of that I would like to align with the recommended solution for logging. As far as I have understood the outcome of that part of the discussion was "c) use slf4j over creating yet another logging facade". So my question is if this logging framework as been chosen (as in that is where hudson v3 is heading) and will work with Hudson v2 as well? If yes is safe to assume that my maven dependency should be set to provided ? Best regards Henrik _______________________________________________ hudson-dev mailing list hudson-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/hudson-dev
Back to the top