[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [higgins-dev] Java 5, going once...
|
Not sure, it depends on when customers move off Java 1.4 as we have not seen a big migration to Java 1.5 at all, some people get hung up on the neat features and forget about what is deployed and what is being used in the field.
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
"George Stanchev" ---12/03/2008 10:10:36 AM---Tony, do you have a timeframe in mind when IBM would be dropping support for 1.4 and you'd be lifting the -1?
![]()
From: | ![]()
"George Stanchev" <Gstanchev@xxxxxxxxxx> |
![]()
To: | ![]()
"Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
![]()
Cc: | ![]()
<higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
![]()
Date: | ![]()
12/03/2008 10:10 AM |
![]()
Subject: | ![]()
RE: [higgins-dev] Java 5, going once... |
Tony, do you have a timeframe in mind when IBM would be dropping support for 1.4 and you'd be lifting the -1?
From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Nadalin
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 6:31 PM
To: Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions
Cc: higgins-dev; higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [higgins-dev] Java 5, going once...
All IBM commiters vote is for option -1
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
"Tom Doman" ---12/02/2008 06:24:53 PM---+2
![]()
From: | ![]()
"Tom Doman" <tdoman@xxxxxxxxxx> |
![]()
To: | ![]()
"higgins-dev" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
![]()
Date: | ![]()
12/02/2008 06:24 PM |
![]()
Subject: | ![]()
Re: [higgins-dev] Java 5, going once... |
+2
>>> Paul Trevithick <ptrevithick@xxxxxxxxx> 12/02/08 4:44 PM >>>
I think we*ve had sufficient time to air the issues for and against. I
would
ask all Higgins committers to vote by Monday (Dec 8th) as follows:
- 1 = no change (the entire project stays on Java 1.4)
0 = abstain
+1 = selected components of Higgins 1.1 may use Java 5
+2 = the entire Higgins 1.1 project moves to Java 5.0
For the +1 case, the relevant component owner will make the decision.
My vote is +2
-- Paul
http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/team- leaders.php
_______________________________________________
higgins- dev mailing list
higgins- dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins- dev
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
**********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev

