|
Removed IContext.getModel(URI)
See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=213352
See http://dev.eclipse.org/viewsvn/index.cgi?view=rev&root=Technology_SVN&revision=6870
>>> "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> 12/14/07 5:59 PM >>>
IContextModel.getMOcel(URI) predates IContext.getModel(URI).
From what I remember, we discussed adding IContext.getModel(URI), but what happened is that someone added IContextModel.getModel(URI). I later added IContext.getModel(URI) per my understanding of the discussion, and I decided to leave IContextModel.getModel(URI) in case anyone was using it.
I can agree with removing IContext.getModel(URI). Anything we can do to keep the interfaces simple/less bloated is good.
I'll remove it unless anyone objects.
Jim
>>> "Tom Doman" <tdoman@xxxxxxxxxx> 12/14/07 5:21 PM >>>
This interface is required to be implemented on both IContext and IContextModel. Why?
If I have do implement it in both places, I'd have the IContext version call getContextModel() and call it's getModel(). Which begs the question, why is there?
I like getModel() on IContextModel but others may have wanted it on IContext for some reason. Does anyone have a strong feeling and\or recollection of why this came out so?
Thanks,
Tom
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
| 