[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [higgins-dev] Contributing Bandit utilities to Higgins
|
What about two separate projects, one for the base and one for the .cp specific code?
Duane
>>> "Tom Doman" <TDoman@xxxxxxxxxx> 07/17/07 4:54 PM >>>
All right then, I'd like to at least contribute the Java Script stuff to share among all the relying CPs. How does a org.eclipse.higgins.util.jscript project sound? It could contain an org.eclipse.higgins.util.jscript.idas.cp package for the IdAS specific stuff with the main part of the project containing only jscript utility functionality.
Tom
>>> "Mary Ruddy" <marY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 7/17/2007 1:35 PM >>>
While I can't speak for all the Bandit Utilities, there are some for
which we don't have an equivalent Higgins function today. That's why
they have been dual licensed under EPL - to facilitate use by Higgins.
-----Original Message-----
From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Nadalin
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 5:42 PM
To: Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions
Cc: higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx; higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [higgins-dev] Contributing Bandit utilities to Higgins
What are these utilities for ? Do we already have equivalent function in
Higgins today ? Making a generic utilities package is hard as it tends
to be a catch all
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
Inactive hide details for "Tom Doman" ---07/16/2007 11:55:31
AM---Currently, all Bandit utilities used in Novell contribute CPs"Tom
Doman" ---07/16/2007 11:55:31 AM---Currently, all Bandit utilities used
in Novell contribute CPs are dual licensed under the EPL and LGPL.
Having them in a diffe
From:
"Tom Doman" <TDoman@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:
<higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
07/16/2007 11:55 AM
Subject:
[higgins-dev] Contributing Bandit utilities to Higgins
_____
Currently, all Bandit utilities used in Novell contribute CPs are dual
licensed under the EPL and LGPL. Having them in a different project
from Higgins actually makes it harder for us to debug, modify, and
maintain them as we make changes in Higgins. We've discussed moving
them into the Higgins project so I'd like to know if anyone within or
outside Novell has any issues with just moving these to Higgins. If
not, where would we like them? org.eclipse.higgins.util?
Thanks,
Tom
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
