From:
higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Nadalin
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007
12:50 PM
To: Higgins
(Trust Framework) Project developer discussions
Cc: 'Higgins
(Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'; higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [higgins-dev] Code
Changes
yep that would be good, I also assume we are complete
on milestone .8 and we can hold on that until after the interop
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
"Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>
|
"Jim
Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by:
higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
06/06/2007 11:44 AM
|
Please respond to
"Higgins \(Trust
Framework\) Project developer discussions" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer
discussions'" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
Re: [higgins-dev]
Code Changes
|
|
sounds good.
If/when we need to do a bug fix, I
suppose we should notify the list just in case of unforseen ramifications?
>>> Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@xxxxxxxxxx> 6/6/07 10:33 AM
>>>
I would
like to propose that all non-bug related changes be held or forked until after
June 25, thus putting a freeze on current code before the Burton Interop, as we
don't want to spend resources chasing bugs that changes might cause, and we
would resume normal processes after June 25th
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
