| Re: [higgins-dev] Java devo: replacement for Iterable |
|
um, me not so clever... you're saying you count for three people, or you like #3? >>> Michael McIntosh <mikemci@xxxxxxxxxx> 3/7/07 7:10 PM >>> +3 ;-) higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 03/07/2007 08:46:05 PM: > +1 > > >>> "Duane Buss" <DBuss@xxxxxxxxxx> 3/7/2007 3:28 PM >>> > I personally think #1 is the simplest and appears to meet all of ourneeds. > > > Duane > > >>> > > From: "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> > To:<higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 3/7/2007 1:26 PM > Subject: [higgins-dev] Java devo: replacement for Iterable > So, our beloved Iterable<someType> way of doing things must die and > be replaced by something else. What do people prefer: > > 1) Use java.lang.Iterator > 2) Use java.util.Enumeration > 3) Build our own iterator interfaces. > > #1 and #2 both have the problem of requiring IdAS consumers to cast > the java.lang.Object(s) coming out of the iterators to the correct java types. > > #3 has the problem of us having to define a lot of new interfaces, > and dealing with the maintenance nightmares that come with decisions > to change apis. > > Jim > > _______________________________________________ > higgins-dev mailing list > higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev _______________________________________________ higgins-dev mailing list higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev |