[higgins-dev] Re: LDAP "person" sample ontology based on Higgins ontolog

["Tom Doman" <TDoman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Again, thanks Mark, you are correct, I left off the "Of".

I think you're right about the object properties for the references equivalents because Protégé gave a different stack with it's latest failure that seems to indicate it's looking for referenced properties that aren't defined.  I'll try that next.

Tom Doman
Novell Inc.

>>> Mark Wahl <Mark.Wahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 9/20/2006 7:43 PM >>>
Tom Doman wrote:

> Good catch!  Thanks!  Unfortunately, Protégé still isn't happy with it.

I also noticed that you are using rdfs:subProperty.  Do you perhaps
mean rdfs:subPropertyOf?  (I don't remember seeing the former in
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/).

With these two changes, your file appears to be OWL-Full.

Another observation- Your object properties for your data model attrs have
owl:equivalentProperty rdf:resource="urn:oid:...".  It might be good
for this OWL file to also have owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="urn:oid:..."
definitions for each of these attributes, otherwise parsers will run into
difficulty as they won't know the RDF "type" of the resource indicated
by the URN.  Similarly, you might also want to have owl:Class definitions
for each of the object class OIDs.  (The Manchester parser gives these as
reasons why your file is not OWL-DL or OWL-Lite).

Mark Wahl
Informed Control Inc.